Practice interviews

Raw output rose 10%. Why are shipments flat?

Keep defects and demand in the operating result.

“Without fundamental knowledge of the equipment, it’s not possible to resolve the problems or determine the true causes” (opens the source)

Norio Ito, Senior expert, Engine Manufacturing Section No. 23, Kamigo Plant · Toyota Times, Jun 20, 2025

The question

Rill Works observes one fully loaded hour. Each defective unit is scrapped; there is no rework. Demand is 90 good units. Each shipment contributes $5; each scrap unit incurs an additional $2 loss. Unsold good units become inventory with no sales contribution in this window. Carrying cost is excluded.

Measured outcomes
Raw unitsGood units
Baseline10088
Faster setting11088
Quality repair10095

These are fixed observed outcomes in an invented case, not random defect probabilities.

“Compare shipments, good inventory, scrap and contribution. Which change should proceed?”

A strong answer, step by step

Open each step in turn. This is one strong answer, not the only one.

Step 1: Count what can ship

What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.

  • Value all 95 good units as current sales.

    Tempting, but it misses something. Demand is 90, so five of the 95 good units remain in inventory.

  • Separate shipments from inventory.

    The strong move. Shipments are capped by demand.

See how a strong candidate says it

“Baseline and faster settings both ship 88. The repaired process ships 90 and holds five good units.”

What a strong candidate could say

Why it works: Shipments are capped by demand.

Step 2: Count the scrap

What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.

  • Check good output after defects.

    The strong move. Raw output minus good output is the loss.

  • Reward the extra ten raw units.

    Tempting, but it misses something. Extra raw units can all become additional scrap.

See how a strong candidate says it

“Scrap is 12, 22 and 5 units respectively.”

What a strong candidate could say

Why it works: Raw output minus good output is the loss.

Step 3: Calculate contribution

What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.

  • Ignore scrap cost.

    Tempting, but it misses something. Scrap incurs the stated $2 loss per unit.

  • Use shipped units and observed losses.

    The strong move. Use $5 per shipment minus $2 per scrap unit.

See how a strong candidate says it

“Baseline contributes $416, faster $396, and repaired $440.”

What a strong candidate could say

Why it works: Use $5 per shipment minus $2 per scrap unit.

Step 4: Choose the tested improvement

What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.

  • Repair and verify the defect cause.

    The strong move. The faster setting loses $20 and still misses demand.

  • Choose speed based on raw throughput.

    Tempting, but it misses something. The faster trace ships no more and scraps ten extra units.

See how a strong candidate says it

“Quality repair gains $24 per hour, meets demand and leaves five good units.”

What a strong candidate could say

Why it works: The faster setting loses $20 and still misses demand.

The answer, in short

Decision
Use the quality repair; do not approve the faster setting from raw output alone.
Because
It meets current demand with fewer losses and higher contribution.
What would change it
At demand of 100, the repaired trace ships all 95 good units but still falls short by five.

Common traps

  • Counting inventory as current revenue.
  • Confusing raw and good throughput.

Check your answer

  • I capped shipments at demand.
  • I recorded good inventory.
  • I deducted scrap losses.
  • I compared the actual contribution.

Last reviewed Nov 10, 2026